Stalker: Chilliwack man tormenting Surrey woman for years by posting hundreds of YouTube videos targeting her by name
Warrants issued a month ago for Andy Kyungho Yun for repeated breaches of court conditions, police know his address, yet he’s still out
The videos are moronic, incoherent, just stupid.
They are badly made by an adult using ridiculous digital masks in which he spews nonsense, often while smoking a joint.
But when you realize that many of these hundreds of YouTube clips posted by 48-year-old Andy Kyungho Yun of Chilliwack are specifically targeting an innocent woman in Surrey who barely knows him, it’s not just nonsense.
It’s scary and its’ criminal.
“I can barely leave my house,” S.K. told me Monday (April 20, 2026).
“I’m feeling like I’m trapped in my own home. I’m going through therapy. I don’t know if he’s outside…. It’s really disturbing.”
Want to support independent journalism?
Consider a one-time donation or subscribe for less than $1 a week so I can continue this work.
S.K. – whose name I’m not using to protect her – barely even knows Yun. The two worked together almost 25 years ago at a health insurance provider headquartered in Burnaby. They weren’t a couple or even friends, just co-workers.
After all that time, in early 2024, Yun found her on LinkedIn and they had a brief online conversation.
Back when they worked together, S.K. said Yun was a “completely normal person.” But the conversation on LinkedIn quickly got weird, S.K. politely thanked him for reaching out and blocked him thinking that would be the end of it.
“Instead, it was the beginning of the stalking,” S.K. said.
Just a few excerpts of the bizarre videos Yun posted focused on S.K.
Yun is charged with one count of criminal harassment from April 1, 2024, with an offence location of Surrey, a breach of undertaking on that count in Surrey and then a count of fear of injury to person from exactly a year later, April 1, 2025.
Since then, Yun never stopped harassing her with hundreds and hundreds of bizarre YouTube videos where he mentions her by name, making threatening comments in bizarre voices with digital masks of superheroes and monsters. In some of the online videos, he is wearing a hat with a crest of what appears to be a law enforcement agency of some kind.
Yun now faces two more charges of breach of release orders from March 2 and March 3, 2026, with an offence location of Chilliwack where he lives. At his last court date on March 24, 2026, in Surrey Provincial Court, he must not have appeared because a warrant was issued for his arrest.
Yun is out of custody facing nine court-ordered conditions about not contacting S.K. or posting about her online, but also including a highly unusual complete ban from the City of Surrey. He’s not allowed anywhere in the municipality except to attend court, passing through on Highway 1, and to pick up his impounded vehicle and dog.
Online stalking expands
The online criminal harassment is traumatizing enough as all victims of this activity know, but Yun has gone even further, according to S.K.
“He actually showed up at my work and tried to gain access,” she said. “He told my co-worker he was a federal agent and had to speak to me. Three SUVs came and they arrested him and they released him right away.”
She was shocked given there was already a protection order in place. That was November 2025, the date of the breach charge Yun faces, well after the fear of injury and criminal harassment charges.
Yun also contacted S.K.’s adult daughter.
“I’m constantly paranoid,” she said. “Who’s to say what he’s capable of doing?”
S.K. said she was also disappointed she couldn’t get any media outlets in the Fraser Valley to respond to her other than Something Worth Reading.
“This guy is in your community and nobody got back to me. You are the only person. Your community is small and close-knit, someone should be able to spot him.”
Charter-protects against certain arrests
Why is Yun still wanted and not in custody nearly a month after warrants were issued in provincial court when authorities know exactly where he lives?
Police have told S.K. they have tried to execute the warrants at his home near Little Mountain but have been unsuccessful.
“He refuses to open the door,” S.K. said police told her. “He’s currently evading arrest, but I’m not sure how many times they have gone as of late.”
Why does not answering the door matter? As usual, the Charter. A Supreme Court of Canada decision from 1997 about Section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which addresses unreasonable search and seizure, guides authorities. The split decision in R. v. Feeney ruled that police require judicial authorization to entire a private dwelling to make an arrest. There may already be a warrant for Yun’s arrest, but police need a Feeney warrant to enter the premises if there are reasonable grounds to believe he is home avoiding the arrest.
-30-
Want to support independent journalism?
Consider becoming a paid subscriber or make a one-time donation so I can continue this work.
Paul J. Henderson
pauljhenderson@gmail.com
facebook.com/PaulJHendersonJournalist
instagram.com/wordsarehard_pjh
x.com/PeeJayAitch
wordsarehard-pjh.bsky.social